Legal Opinion of Silvia Stagg
Regarding Insurance Provided For Employees
Of Religious Organizations For Contraception
Silvia Stagg, Filed as a Republican-Independent-Democratic Candidate with the FEC/Federal Election Commission and US Office of Government Ethics Fully endorses Full Payment For SAFE Methods of Contraception To Be Included In All Medical-Health Insurance Programs such as Contraceptive Pills-Diaphragm-IUD/Intra Uturum Device-Topical Jell(s).
All of the foregoing Contraceptive Methods ensure Constitutional Rights for our US Citizenry and All women worldwide as we must lead and not follow into the future! We must remember the US Supreme Court Ruling of 'Separation Between/Of Church and State.' Employment and Employment Related Issues (Including Insurance) are Issues of 'State' Not of 'Church.'
Furthermore, All Safe Methods of Contraception (Including Non ejaculation of male sperm into the female at moment of male orgasm) actually prevents Abortion which is one of the most unwanted problems of modern day women.
Modern Day Man must acknowledge and take responsibility that modern day women are forced to satisfy their Adult Partners and Spouses. And they must be provided with safe alternatives to forced pregnancy, while loving men and women enjoy and are nourished with a healthy, loving and fulfilling sexual relationship which maintains their relationship and family for as long as humanly possible. Since Our White Christian European Descent Society has matured to consider 'Quality of Life' issues and not only 'Socioeconomic Survival' Issues while we progress into the future. Lest we become the tragic 'Oh Brave New World!' Too Frighten to struggle to stabalize, enhance and prolong our most intimate socioeconomic relationships and infrastructure.
This is especially necessary as we progress into Infinite Life Extension with Silvia Stagg's Presidential Candidacy much better received by our esteemed Rick Santorum, the likely Republican Presidential Nominee and next US President!
It is the opinion and belief of Silvia Stagg, that our Holy Catholic Father of the Vatican, Rome-Italy "supports the usage of technology to prolong or sustain life into Infinte Life Extension."
Silvia Stagg further asserts, that by using advanced technology to better, enhance, prolong, sustain or maintain life, especially human life, we are also fully in accord with the 'Intent' of our US Constitution. And fully in accord with the wishes of our Founding Fathers and Mothers, who created this great country for the Betterment, Defense and Posterity of the White Christian European Descent Race.
And God Willing, upon achieving the US Presidency, Silvia Stagg, either as Republican or Democrat, shall utilize our advanced technology for goodness sake, disseminating Life Extension, and other purposes.
Another example, in this Contraception-Abortion Issue related public debate, the use of Teletransportation (a Black Ops Technology) may be used to gently remove an unwanted child from the womb of its mother and insert said unwanted child into another wanting mother's womb. Thereby, resolving the need/desire for abortion! Additionally, allowing the 'State' to fully effectuate its 'Constitutional Mandate to provide legal advocacy' to all/both parties at interest/at issue, 'especially the helpless and most vulnerable in our society.' And this is the appropriate usage of our US Constitutional problem solving.
End of Press Release
Legal Opinion of Silvia Stagg
I proudly support the decision made by our United States Senate 'Not To Vote'for the Blunt Amendment Bill (S. 1467), on Thursday March 1-2012. Please take notice, the Blunt Amendment was referred to Senate Committee. Status: Read Twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. 'Vote.' A similar 'Respect for Rights of Conscience Act' (H.R. 1179) was offered by House Representative Jeff Fortenberry. On March 28-2011 H.R. 1179 was referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and is still pending. To keep abreast of all US Congressional Legislation, via Internet go to: http://www.thomas.gov/
US Presidential Candidate
Legal Opinion of Silvia Stagg
TODAY 'The Blunt Amendment' Is Being Argued-If Passed Millions of Women And Other Persons Lose Their Rights To Medical-Health Care Of Their Choice!
Silvia Stagg Joins Her Democratic Friends
Oppossing the Blunt Amendment
Re: Contraception Issue Discussed In Facebook
Dear Readers: Women have a right to protect themselves, their bodies, minds and souls. We as human beings must cease taking away the personal rights of women. We are talking about civil and human rights of women, men and children and their relationships and their lives. Contraception prevents abortion. Those who seek to prevent health and safety standards, civil and human rights should be prosecuted. We have in the United States a 'Separation of Church and State,' and the Catholic Church keeps violating this edict. They need to cease or lose their Religious Organization 'Tax Exemption' for being Political Lobbyists (with non constitutional reasoning). God Bless America!
Reprinted as a Puiblic Service
Article From AARP/American Association For Retired Persons
Amid Deficit Cutting, Food Security Is At Stake
While Congresss focuses on budget cuts, AARP is calling for reauthorization of the Older Americans Act, which provides nutrition, home-based care and social services for adults 60 and older. Technically, the law expired earlier this year, but it was funded by a series of stopgap measures. The program has had bipartisan support since 1965, when it was created along with Medicare and Medicaid. But Funding is now an issue. Local food providers such as Meals on Wheels say the recession has increased the need but squeezed the government's capactiy to pay for it. Advocates for the program say it can actually be a cost saver, when the difference between keeping a frail older person in his or her home is compared withthe cost in an assisted living facility. "Food security among seniors is a moral issue and a financial issue," Senator Bernie Sanders, Independent-Vermont, said at a recent Senate Hearing. "Investing in senior nutrition...saves money for the government because when we do that, we make sure that our seniors have adequate nutrition and are nt going to end up in the emergency room." Preserving the $2 Billion program will require lawmakers to find comparable cuts in the domestic budget. AARP, in testimony to Sanders' Subcommittee, said that 5 Million older Adults, or about 11.4 percent of all Aans 60-plus, experienced some kind of food security between 2001 and 2005. Further, state funding for those progrmas has not kept pace with the growing demand for meals. "As the need for services increases, particularly given the economic situation, the resources available aer becoming more scarce," said David Certner, AARP's legislative director. "The [Older Americans] Act provides important help to some of our most vulnerable low-income seniors, and it is important that they be protected."
END of Article
Silvia Stagg For President